TR
Defense ArgumentAgainst Bind-Over
For the Record · Point XII of XVII

Parents Absent

Defense argument against bind-over

Argument · 12 of 17

XII. The State Did Not Call the Parents Who Allegedly Heard an Admission

The charging document contains dramatic claims about Mr. Robinson’s parents.

It alleges:

Neither parent testified.

The Court did not hear:

The charging document repeatedly uses the word “implied.”

An implication is not a quotation. It is an interpretation.

Without the parents, the defense could not ask what was actually said. That omission matters most because the State and media publicly converted “implied” into “confessed.” The record presented to this Court does not contain a recorded parental confession. It contains investigative accounts of what absent witnesses allegedly interpreted.

Back to top ↑